Blogger Hacks, Categories, Tips & Tricks

Friday, September 30, 2005
A plea for integration rather than separation, from Google Blogoscoped:
Yahoo’s new Site Explorer shows which pages are indexed from a specific domain, and which backlinks point to the domain. I’m a bit underwhelmed by what I see – couldn’t they just allow [site:] and [link:] operators in their web search?
See Yahoo Site Explorer

Filed in: , ,
Posted at 9:21 AM by John.
Adam Hertz has posted an update that may explain the crazy ranking flip that's happened here (and elsewhere, in a less crazy way...) Apparently the service will now focus on recent activity & current buzz,... so those 500 links from that election rant you wrote in 2000 won't guarantee you an exalted place in the rankings any more.....

Looks like ranking will be based on 6 month's worth of buzz, while a complete list of inbounds will still be available from the URL search.

My (almost exactly) 6 month's worth of buzz seems to have been worth a good deal...., so a tip of the hat to readers, subscribers, & most especially to linkers!!

Technorati Weblog: :
For URL search, we've been looking closely at how we calculate the number of links and sources pointing to a blog, and we've made some tweaks to the display to better surface recent blog activity. Technorati now displays the total number of links from blogs over the last 6 months. Up until now, we displayed a count of all links from blog homepages, which tended to weight more highly blogs that have been around for a long time, even if they have not been posting recently.

The change affects how Technorati ranks its over 18.5 million blogs. Our new link counts expose more active blogs and rising stars, allowing readers to discover blogs currently receiving the attention of the blogosphere.
Filed in: , ,
Posted at 9:16 AM by John.
Wow... there's really ninety-three? Ouch. Here's the scoop from ProBlogger:
Steve Rubel points to a useful resource over at seomoz on Search Engine Ranking Factors which is one of the better descriptions of how Search Engines rank pages that I’ve seen recently. It lists 93 factors to keep in mind. Sounds like a lot to remember - so luckily they’ve arranged them into different levels of importance....


A 93-point site makeover? We'd be working all week!!

Filed in: , , ,
Posted at 9:09 AM by John.
Wednesday, September 28, 2005
This strikes me as very cool indeed. Rollyo is a search engine that lets you "roll your own" searches. Each searchroll will index 25 sites of your choice & you can have an unlimited number of searchrolls. What a great tool for focussed and reliable results. It will only look at sites that you've already decided are relevant & useful to you.

Want to break out your blogroll by topic & see what's new easily & quickly?
Want to check in with a topic that you don't keep on top of 24/7?

Browse the lists that are already on Rollyo, or roll your own search today.

via BoingBoing

Filed in:
Posted at 7:29 PM by John.
<     >
GahooYoogle
GahooYoogle, a simultaneous search of two of the major engines. Interesting both for the differences in results & for the pace of the feedback.

Via Feedblog.

Posted at 5:58 PM by John.
Philipp at Google Blogoscoped points up the "snake eating it's own tail" flaws in the system that make it hard to take Google's anti-splog battle seriously. The system digests itself, & we're simply the reflux.

Maybe Google Inc is or was* merely naive when it comes to splogs. They allow one-click publishing (Blogger.com), one-click content aggregation (Google News alerts), and easy, context-sensitive advertising on top (AdSense). Some blogs even use Google Alerts hooked up to Blogger’s blog-by-email functionality to let Google be the author (you’ll recognize one of those blogs when you see them because they contain “unsubscribe” links within posts – that’s right, you can help destroy such blog by unsubscribing its alerts).


Somehow this circle has to be broken, or is splog generation the optimum use of google blogger? Has the system found its perfect expression in the blogs that Philipp links to?

Posted at 5:41 PM by John.
Randy reports that it's all about finding new links. That sounds about right. Let's see how long it takes the various engines to find this link.

When Google blog search was released, I was amazed how much better it was then the other engines. Since then, Technorati has improved, IceRocket has improved and maybe now we have a four-way challenge with Bloglines (the best last month) and Google (the newcomer). Let's start it again.


Posted at 5:30 PM by John.
gets a first-hand positive review at Blogger Templates.

Blogger is quick to say "This feature is not guaranteed to work every time you lose a post, but it's always worth a shot."

Beyond that, you can read more about Blogger's Recover Post feature.


Good to hear that it works & is a useful addition....

Posted at 5:24 PM by John.
Tuesday, September 27, 2005
So for once I'm not going to complain at Technorati's comedy results. Instead, for the few moments 'til they fix it, I'm going to experience the rush that comes when you're the lord high king of the bloggers...

* Last updated 3 minutes ago
* By John
* Technorati Rank: 8,530 (377 links from 139 sites)

So in some crazy parallel universe where every inbound gets counted 3 times, I broke the top 10,000. Spectacular!!

(maybe in this parallel universe I should get some adsense!!)

Update 9/28: Maybe this is permanent? Other blogs are definitely affected....

Posted at 6:30 PM by John.
Greg, who blogs at both Vent & Speccy, has upgraded the category drop-down form with a javascript that adds a post-count for each category, showing the relative importance of each & giving the reader some idea of what they're getting into. He's also using a great footer that shows the number of posts in categories next to each del.icio.us tag. Pretty cool. He promises a how-to soon, (to which I promise to link, if that's any incentive...) but in the meantime suggests a view-source & crib approach. This may be harder than it looks.....

Posted at 6:06 PM by John.
Jeremy at SEOMix confirms that the page title hack that flips the order of post title & site name will be beneficial for post-pages trying to bubble up in search results. His ultimate implementation involves the dropping of the site name from post-page titles altogether. So that's the next question. How important is the brand? (not very important if no-one can find it, I guess....)

Thanks for the input, Jeremy, & for copying me on the conversation.

Posted at 5:53 PM by John.
Want to edit the comments on your blog? There's a Greasemonkey Script that can help. Dunpanic's script is hosted at Userscripts.org & "adds a comment edit link beside the trash can icon in the comment view for the author." This, we like. I have yet to test it, but it certainly promises to add a significant & missing function....

...& oh, BTW, Choongyong's blog looks v. interesting too.

Update: Edited for accuracy in response to Dunpanic's comment. Thanks for the feedback, & sorry for the error!!

Posted at 5:32 PM by John.
Thursday, September 22, 2005
For those of you who are artistically / buttonally inclined, here's the code for linking in with the new spiffy button:


<a href="http://blogfresh.blogspot.com"><img src="http://www.geocities.com/jrfj44/freshblogbutton_red.php.png"></a>

Posted at 1:46 PM by John.
so maybe I should offer one? See The RSS Blog for the scoop.

Update: Have added R|Mail subscription service to this blog. Thanks to Randy @ KBCafe.

Filed in:
Posted at 12:14 PM by John.
Hosting the sites and placing the ads.... right hand needs to watch the left hand a little more?

Business Week
:

Google sits at the center of the spam-blog universe, and with its new search engine, this could get worse. Here's why. Google already runs the biggest free blogging service in the world, Blogger. Since it's free, easy and popular, Blogger unwittingly hosts loads of the spam blogs. Google also operates the largest automatic ad-placement service, AdSense. That provides much of the revenue for spam blogs. And you can bet that the spammers are already gaming their blogs to climb toward the top of Google's new blog search.

The good news: Now that Google is in the middle of the spamosphere, perhaps it will focus its prodigious brainpower into vanquishing the spam bots and their pollution. For now, though, Google's entrée into blog search doesn't change much. I'll be using the engine from time to time, especially its useful tool to find relevant blogs. But even with Google in the mix, blog search is still very much a work in progress.


via Micropersuasion

Posted at 11:51 AM by John.
Wednesday, September 21, 2005
Jason Calacanis wonders whether there's a way to add a one-click "add-to-google" link to your sidebar. I'd like that too, so if you know how to make it happen & are willing to share your solution, that would be great!!

Posted at 5:02 PM by John.
<     >
Traffic Boost
Is it Google or is it Blogger Templates?

Thanks, blogger templates, for the link & for the boost in incoming traffic for my blogger hacks post. Much appreciated. Have a subscription for your trouble!!

Filed in:
Posted at 4:23 PM by John.
Tuesday, September 20, 2005
As a follow up to last week's rant about page titles, many thanks to Fritz at Cycle.icio.us for the best hack yet (I hope...)

Use that multi-purpose <$blogpagetitle> smart tag in your template? Have you ever wanted to mess with your page titles? Turns out that main & archive page conditional tags are valid in the head of your template as well as in the body. This means that you can replace the smart tag with a string that might work a little harder for you in the world o' the search engines. For instance... I read a couple of posts the other week about site name decreasing keyword relevance in page titles, & went off on a "how do you mess with that" rant. With Fritz's hack, you can omit the site name from your post pages completely or flip it to the back of the line. You can also expand the main page title with a bit of juicy content description.

How, I hear you cry?

Simply switch the existing page title string (probably <title><$blogpagetitle$></title> ) for this wonderful block of artfully combined blogger tags:

<head>
<MainOrArchivePage>
<title>Sitename: Site Description</title>
</MainOrArchivePage>
<Blogger>
<ItemPage>
<BlogItemTitle>
<title>
<$BlogItemTitle$> - Sitename Optional
</title>
</BlogItemTitle>
</ItemPage>
</Blogger>

then edit the plain text to suit your site. I don't know why it didn't occur to me that the conditional tags might be valid in the head as well as the body... I'm certainly glad that it occurred to Fritz!! Many Thanks!!

See other posts in Blogger Hacks: The Series
Filed In:
Posted at 6:21 PM by John.
After letting us get in free for their 10th birthday, Opera decided that the buzz from giving stuff away was just so great that from now on they're free every day. More browsers...

See also: Ibt4Im, Zoli's Blog, Google Blogoscoped

Posted at 3:05 PM by John.
& use a keyword search in Bloogle to substitute for categories: orangewise has the scoop:
Check my categories on the right to see what I've done. Search your own URL any other keyword(s). No need for tagging your blog or re-tagging.
Of course, in a desperate attempt to retain my audience as my workarounds become irrelevant, I would continue to argue that the increased traffic & exposure from tagging makes it worth the extra effort to use del.icio.us ;-)

Filed In: , , , , , ,
Posted at 9:08 AM by John.
Another great category method from Virtual Scratchpad: :
I decided to rely on Blogger's built-in search engine to create the categories. That way, if people can read your blog, they can use your categories. Plus, you can have as many as you like without worrying about organization.
**Update: These keywords do have the rel="tag" attribute & will be detected by technorati tags search. I mistakenly suggested otherwise**

Downside: Your posts won't be listed on Del.icio.us.

Upside: You don't have to bookmark your posts anywhere.... Just write them, paste in the code, and publish.

Great work!! More straightforward than the other methods explored here. Interesting!! Anyone want to Greasemonkey this up so that we have a script that generates bloogle keywords? (I'll look into it.....)

Filed In: , , , , ,
Posted at 8:57 AM by John.
Monday, September 19, 2005
already?

Fritz at RedMountain is of the opinion that Google BlogSearch is already able to execute a tag search, using the tag: modifier. As he points out, they'll have a hard time finding tags at the end of posts from any blog that publishes a partial feed, since the feed will snip the tags. Another incentive for bloggers to publish full feeds!!

On a related matter: I have not been able to properly duplicate this experiment since I found that this blog was set to publish a partial feed in atom, which probably means that the feedburner feed that is set for full publication was only pulling a partial feed as it's source & so wasn't doing what I thought it was doing. I switched it up to full feed & hopefully you'll see more Freshblog goodies in your feedreaders, & google blogsearch will see my tags, & I will be able to duplicate this discovery as soon as Freshblog's been crawled.

While we wait, anyone who would care to re-create Fritz's experiment, & thusly expose one of the surprises that we have coming when blogsearch gets out of beta, should please post their experiences & results in the comments!!

Oh, and hey, publish a full feed already, would you? ;-)

Filed In:
Posted at 4:38 PM by John.
Hey... I'm blogger of the day at I Blog Therefore I Am. Thanks, Randy!! Cool idea for a series.

Have been thinking of starting my own series for a while, & here it is: What's the best blog I'm not reading?

Some reasons that I could be persuaded to read another blog:
  1. content
  2. theme / topic
  3. style
  4. timeliness / relevance
  5. connection to the blogosphere (links / responses / conversations)
So what's the best blog I'm not reading? Could be your blog, could be a blog you never miss. Use my hopelessly dated contact form to e-mail me with a tip, & I'll post responses here with a link to both the nominator & nominated blogs.
Posted at 4:08 PM by John.
Sunday, September 18, 2005
according to Jonah Chanticleer.
I'm using Safari, and it appears to work, but it might not be . . . wait a sec. (laughing) Okay, it was forcing me to type the text in this tiny, single line text box-- and then after a long period (Downloaded 14 of 15 items, etc.) it suddenly expanded the text box to match the space of the dialog box. In other words, it's a blogger/safari issue, not an XBlogThis issue.
By extension (no pun intended) I guess that means that categorytagblogthis and delicioustagblogthis will work in Safari too. I downloaded Opera the other day (when they were giving it away for free on their birthday...) Maybe I should try it in there too.

Posted at 4:05 PM by John.
<     >
Google Cache
Accessing the google cache to find the missing blog maverick post this morning reminded me of last week's 365 tomorrows entry, the 9 billion names of god.
It started back when Google was just a thesis project, back when it was just a drop in the data sea. No one thought to stop it back then. That web site you had, the one you forgot about. Almost everyone’s got one of those, right? But Google doesn’t forget. Google’s studied that thing so many times that it’s studied its own caches of you. What do you figure happens, when a site gets so big that it’s bigger than the internet?”

“It’s still a part of the internet, though.”

“No. Now, the internet is a part of Google.”

The man had a point.
How big is the cache? Is it big enough that the "live" internet is only a part of it? Hmmmm.
Posted at 1:55 PM by John.
While we're asking for stuff from Blogger / Google.... My posts are very hard to find using regular search engines unless I include the title of this blog. Am I correct in thinking that the blog name in the post-page title decreases the relevance of the post title / keyword itself? Would I be better placed if the site name didn't appear in post page titles?

Filed In:
Posted at 1:46 PM by John.
Have been thinking about rankings since I commented that their absence from Google did not seem too critical to me, & I've changed my mind.... I don't care so much whether or not this blog has a ranking, but the other way I use rankings on Technorati is to determine the significance of my new inbound links & their potential for bringing me new traffic.... so sure, Google, add a ranking system & help me to get a sense of my inbounds.....

Filed In:
Posted at 1:31 PM by John.